Feasibility and safety of daily adapted MR-guided SABR for pancreatic cancer in the UK
James Good,
United Kingdom
OC-0112
Abstract
Feasibility and safety of daily adapted MR-guided SABR for pancreatic cancer in the UK
Authors: James Good1, Ben George2, Suliana Teoh3, Andrew Gaya1, Robert Owens3, Luis Aznar Garcia1, Maxwell Robinson4, Alexander Martin1, Kwun-Ye Chu4, Somnath Mukherjee3, Tim Maughan3
1GenesisCare, Radiation Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2GenesisCare, Medical Physics, Oxford, United Kingdom; 3University of Oxford, Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom; 4Oxford University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Report the successful
completion of a UK-based Compassionate Access Programme to provide daily
adapted MR-guided (MRgRT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for
pancreatic cancer, including patient selection criteria, planning approach and
tumour characteristics. Demonstrate the dosimetric benefits of MRgRT and report
acute toxicity rates in this cohort.
Material and Methods
Eligibility included
patients with borderline resectable, locally advanced, medically inoperable,
and locally recurrent disease; good organ function; ECOG PS 0-2; and no frank
luminal invasion. For each treatment course dosimetric data was available from
baseline treatment plans calculated on the anatomy at simulation; predicted
doses from the baseline plan calculated on the daily anatomy; and treatment
plans based on daily anatomy. UK SABR Consortium organ at risk (OAR)
constraints were used alongside those accepted internationally. All patients
were offered an online system to collect patient reported outcome measures
(PROMs).
Results
Fifty patients were
accepted for treatment following multidisciplinary team review. Median age was
71 (max 89, minimum 40) and 28/50 (56%) were male. The most common (46/50, 92%)
prescription dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions on alternate days. Median GTV volume
was 49.6 cc (min 12.7 cc, max 273.1 cc). Forty-nine patients completed
treatment. The rate of grade 3+ acute toxicity was 10%. Late toxicity, local control and survival outcomes will
be reported.
For baseline
treatment plans, median target coverage was 77.9% (minimum 52.4%, maximum
95.0%) with no violations of mandatory OAR dose constraints (median OAR V36 =
0.0 cc). Predicted treatment plans showed increased doses to critical OARs (median
OAR V36 = 0.6 cc, V33 = 1.2 cc). Using adaptive MRgRT, the re-optimized
treatment plans showed no violations of mandatory OAR dose constraints (median
OAR V36 = 0.0 cc, V33 = 0.01 cc) whilst maintaining target coverage (median
75.5%, min 48.5%, maximum 98.9%).
Conclusion
Adaptive MRgRT SABR is
feasible with acceptable rates of acute toxicity in the setting of a UK-based
Compassionate Access Programme. Daily plan re-optimisation allows for OAR dose
constraints to be met without compromise of target coverage. These results have
informed the design of a prospective dose escalation study.