The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on radiotherapy referral pathways in Victoria, Australia
Nigel Anderson,
Australia
PO-1045
Abstract
The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on radiotherapy referral pathways in Victoria, Australia
Authors: Nigel Anderson1, Colin Hornby1, Katie Karanika1
1Victorian State Government Department of Health, Cancer Services and Information, Melbourne, Australia
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Cancer services in Australia and radiotherapy specifically prioritize
access, safety and quality for all patients, and where possible, care close to
home. Ongoing expansion of treatment facilities, combined with pre-existing
referral pathways, are key enablers to meeting this need across vast
geographical expanses. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, jurisdictional
government enforced restrictions were imposed to limit disease transmission in
Victoria, Australia. Restrictions included significant barriers on movement in
and out of regional Victoria into metropolitan Melbourne- often a necessity to
meet complex radiotherapy needs. The restrictions only allowed essential,
permitted travel to traverse the physical greater Melbourne boundary. The aim
of this review was to investigate recent Victorian radiotherapy patient
pathways and determine the impact (if any) of pandemic restrictions on
radiotherapy referrals.
Material and Methods
All patients treated with radiotherapy in Victoria from January
2018 to December 2020 were included in this analysis. Each radiotherapy
department was classified as metropolitan or regional, according to the
metropolitan Melbourne geographical boundary. Patients were categorized into geographic
rings (10km, 25km, 50km, 75km, 100km, 150+km) from the radiotherapy department where
they received their care. Anatomical treatment site for each patient was also captured
to assess disease-specific referral impact.
Results
Between January 2018 and December 2020, 60,930 patients
received radiotherapy in Victoria. Treatment <50km from place of residence
occurred in 79.7% (2018), 80.2% (2019) and 82.7% (2020) of patients. While in
parallel, treatment >150km from home was seen in 6.8% (2018), 6.2% (2019)
and 4.9% (2020) of patients. In metropolitan radiotherapy departments,
treatment >150km from home decreased from 7.0% (2018) and 6.3% (2019), to
4.7% (2020). Comparatively, regional patients traveling >150km for
radiotherapy remained relatively stable (2018: 6.4%; 2019: 6.1%; 2020: 6.2%).
Metropolitan radiotherapy declined 8.6%, 2.7%, 9.5%, 12.2% and 9.9% for breast,
lung, brain, lower GI and head and neck radiotherapy courses from 2019 to 2020,
respectively. Regional providers experienced mixed referral pathway
fluctuations in the same cohorts (breast: -3.7%; lung: +6.7%; brain: +19.0%; lower
GI: 0.6%; head and neck: +13.4%). These findings are indicative of the
heightened movement restrictions and physical boundary that were put in place
in metropolitan Melbourne, compared to regional Victoria.
Conclusion
Pandemic restrictions had varying impacts on Victorian
radiotherapy patients accessing treatment in 2020. Further investigation is
required to understand the decreased travel to metropolitan radiotherapy hubs
from regional Victoria, and whether adopted pathways are sustainable long term
to enable treatment closer to home, where possible, without compromising
optimal cancer care.