Assessment of Surface Guided Radiation therapy in Breast cancer: An Indian Experience
PO-1039
Abstract
Assessment of Surface Guided Radiation therapy in Breast cancer: An Indian Experience
Authors: Mansi Barthwal1, Vibhay Pareek1, Jyoti Yadav2, Sreejesh MS3, Raj Kishor Bisht3, Pritee Patil1, Aman Sharma1, Daya Nand Sharma4, Subramani V5, Supriya Mallick1
1National Cancer Institute, AIIMS, Radiation Oncology, New Delhi, India; 2National Cancer Institute, AIIMS, Radiation Physics, New Delhi, India; 3National Cancer Institute, Radiation Physics, New Delhi, India; 4National Cancer Institute, IRCH, AIIMS, Radiation Oncology, New Delhi, India; 5National Cancer Institute, IRCH, Radiation Physics, New Delhi, India
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) in new, non-invasive technique for
patient positioning and monitoring which uses visible light for position
determination and helps reduce daily imaging. In this study, we assess the role
SGRT in setup uncertainties and intrafraction motion with standard practices.
Material and Methods
Between
January 2021 and October 2021, a total of 25 patients with histopathologically
proven breast cancer who were treated with radiation therapy were enrolled and
planned for SGRT-based setup. The comparison was done with similar cohort of
patients who were positioned by aligning skin markers to the room lasers
(Laser-based setup - LBS). The surface-based setup (SBS) included an optical
surface scanning system which was used for daily setup and the intrafraction
movements were accounted. In
initial setup, SGRT was compared to three‐point setup using tattoos on the
patient and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Results
Among
the 25 patients evaluated, median time for SBS and LBS was 265 seconds and 435
seconds respectively (p=0.012). There
was no difference in the treatment time duration in both groups. Keeping the
clinical tolerance at 5 mm, a total of 96% of treatment sessions were within
the tolerance in any direction (lateral, longitudinal or vertical) using SBS,
compared to 89% for LBS (p=0.023). In translational directions, the difference
in the two setup modalities was seen in the lateral direction (p<0.001) with
no difference in the longitudinal and vertical directions. Similarly, there was
a significant difference in the rotational error favouring SBS (p=0.031) over
LBS. The median intrafraction movement was found to be 1.2 mm with SBS.
Conclusion
Our study shows that the surface-based setup has definite
advantage over the conventional
laser-based setup in terms of setup time and positioning errors. The use of daily
SGRT improves patient setup without additional imaging dose to breast cancer
patients.