Bonesparing radiotherapy for anal cancer. -Initial planning quality for the DACG II trial
Camilla Kronborg,
Denmark
PD-0499
Abstract
Bonesparing radiotherapy for anal cancer. -Initial planning quality for the DACG II trial
Authors: Camilla Kronborg1, Lars Nyvang2, Jolanta Hansen2, Eva Serup-Hansen3, Birgitte Havelund4, Eva Wilken3, Sean Patrick Mc Ilroy4, Karen-Lise Garm Spindler5
1Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus N, Denmark; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus N, Denmark; 3Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Herlev, Denmark; 4University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Department of Oncology, Vejle, Denmark; 5Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus N, Denmark
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Pelvic insufficiency fracture
(PIF) is a well-known late side effect of pelvic radiotherapy. We have recently found a high frequency of
PIFs in patients with anal (50%) or rectal cancer (30%), 1 and 3 years after
radiotherapy, and analyzed the risk of PIF in relation to radiation dose to
pelvic substructures. Based on localization of PIFs and relation to radiation
dose we have initiated a prospective phase II trial: Bone-sparing
chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer (Danish Anal Cancer Group, DACG II), and
present the initial data from the bone optimized dose planning.
Material and Methods
Patients with indication for
curative chemoradiotherapy underwent planning CT and MRI for standard VMAT photon-plan
generation. Target and elective volumes
were delineated according to the DACG guidelines (modified RTOG). Standard
delineation of organs at risks (OARs) included bowel bag, bladder, femoral
heads, sacral bone, penile bulb, female external genitalia, and for bone
optimizing: sacroiliac (SI)- joints, sacral alae, acetabulum, symphysis, and
total pelvic bones were delineated. A bone-optimized plan was generated
subsequently with following priority: Target coverage>bowel bag> SI-joints/
Sacral Alae> bladder> external female genitalia/penile bulb>
acetabulum/symphysis> total pelvic bones. Plan optimization criteria were: V30 Gy<55%
for pelvic substructures and comparable dose to other OARs. Conformity indices
(V95% for PTV-T (tumor) and E (elective)) and mean dose as well as V30%, (cm3) to remaining
normal tissue (body outline subtracted delineated OARs and bone) were calculated to assure plan
quality. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison of plans and p<0.05
considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 5 VMAT based bone
sparing plans were compared to standard plans (all 3 arcs). Dose to CTV-T and N(node) was 54-60 Gy in 30 fractions and dose to CTV-E was 48 Gy
in 30 fractions. Stages included T1-3, N0-1 (one including paraaortal
lymphnodes). V30 Gy to SI-joints and Alae of the sacral bone was significantly
lower with the bone sparing plans, p=0.043, as were mean doses to sacral bone
and total pelvic bones, p=0.043. Dose to other delineated OARs were comparable.
Conformity indices (V95%) for PTV-T and E were similar between the standard and
the bone optimized plan. Mean doses to remaining normal tissue were comparable,
but V30% (of both elective and tumor dose) was significantly lower with bone
optimized planning (Table 1).
Conclusion
We demonstrate that that sparing of
pelvic bone substructures is feasible with optimization and modulation of
standard plans with-out compromising dose to other OARs and plan quality. Evaluation
of plan quality will continue during inclusion of patients in the trial.