Session Item

Multidisciplinary management
2050
Poster
Radical radiation with Tomotherapy in carcinoma Oropharynx, Larynx & Hypopharynx: Indian experience.
Sreenija Yarlagadda, USA
PO-0121

Abstract

Radical radiation with Tomotherapy in carcinoma Oropharynx, Larynx & Hypopharynx: Indian experience.
Authors:

Yarlagadda Sreenija1, Pushpaja K U1, Anoop R1, Debnarayan Dutta1

1Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Radiation Oncology, Kochi, India

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Audit of outcomes of Radical Radiation (RT) in Carcinoma Oropharynx (OPX), Larynx (LX), Hypopharynx (HPX) treated with Tomotherapy.

Material and Methods

During 2016-2019, consecutive oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients treated with radical intent RT with Tomotherapy were evaluated. RT dose of 70Gy/33 fr for primary PTV and high risk nodal PTV; 66Gy/33fr for intermediate risk nodal PTV and 56.1Gy/33fr for low risk nodal PTV. Node positive and bulky primary (T3/T4) patients received concomitant chemotherapy (CTRT). Acute toxicities, feeding pattern and response to treatment were evaluated. 

Results

102 consecutive patients were analyzed [Median age 66 years (30-82 yrs), male-97(95%), OPX-42(41%), LX-31(30%), HPX-29(29%). Stages I-2(2%), II-10(10%), III-28 (27%), IVA-47(46%), IVB-15 (15%)]. At RT start, 94 were on oral feeds, 4 on Nasogastric tube (NG) feeds, 3 PEG tube feeds and 1 had jejunostomy. 76 received CTRT, 26 received RT alone. Among the CTRT group, 58 received concomitant cisplatin-40mg/m2, weekly (46) and 100 mg/m2, three weekly (12), 17 carboplatin and 1 cetuximab. At median follow up (FU) of 25.5 months, mean overall all survival (OS) for entire cohort was 26 months (SD14.7; range 2-85 months; 1-year: 81.6%, 2-year: 73.6%). Mean OS in oropharyngeal: 25.3 months (1-year:79.3%), laryngeal: 24.9 months (1-year: 80.1%), and hypopharyngeal: 28 months (1-year: 86.2%). At last follow up, 52 (51%) were alive, among them 8 (7%) alive with disease; 35 (34%) expired with disease progression and 15 (15%) patients were lost to follow up. All patients completed RT with 18(17%) having unplanned break. In acute toxicities, mucositis [grade II-55(54%) and grade III-14(14%)] and dermatitis [grade II-21(21%), grade III-2(2%)] were common. 24 patients (23.5%) required additional feeding tube insertion during RT due to dysphagia or prophylactic due to weight loss. At 6 months response evaluation (n=74), 55 (77%) patients had complete response (CR), 12 (17%) had a residual disease [7 primary alone (1 OPX, 2 LX, 4 HPX), 2 nodal disease alone, 7 patients had metastasis]. At mean time to recurrence of 9 months, 7 patients (2 OPX, 3 LX, 2 HPX) had recurrence [5 at primary site, 2 nodal]. Four patients had second primary cancers [2 carcinoma lung, 1 carcinoma tongue, 1 carcinoma OPX].  Laryngectomy was done for 8 patients (6 LX, 1 HPX, 1 OPX with supra-glottic extension); 2 for residual disease, 3 for dysfunctional larynx, 3 for recurrence. 

Conclusion

Outcome and toxicity profile in Indian head & neck cancer patients are similar to the published literature.