This house believes that CBCT-based fast adaptation workflows will supersede broad MR-Linac usage
,
United Kingdom;
,
Germany
In the last years, MR-Linac research, translation and clinical application was the dominating innovation in RT. With the recent introduction of new CBCT-guided linac hardware in combination with streamlined adaptive workflow, the dominance of MR-Linacs in the online-adaptive context might change. Will MR-Linacs completely vanish? Or will they become a niche application like Cyberknife or others? Or will the superiority of the MR-guidance lead to breakthrough-applications? What are the advantages and disadvantages of CBCT-guided online adaptions?
What do you think – will CBCT-based fast adaptation workflows will supersede broad MR-Linac usage? Will our four debaters change your opinion? What will be the majority vote?
Debate
Interdisciplinary
GI / Positioning & Immobilisation / SBRT / Urology