Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
16:30 - 17:30
Business Suite 1-2
Lung 2
Cécile Le Péchoux, France
3506
Poster Discussion
Clinical
FDG PET/CT follow up imaging of durvalumab maintenance in inoperable stage III NSCLC patients
Adrien Holzgreve, Germany
PD-0969

Abstract

FDG PET/CT follow up imaging of durvalumab maintenance in inoperable stage III NSCLC patients
Authors:

Adrien Holzgreve1, Marcus Unterrainer2, Julian Taugner3, Philipp Müller2, Amanda Tufman4,5, Niels Reinmuth6, Minglun Li3, Lena M. Unterrainer1, Peter Bartenstein1,7, Wolfgang G. Kunz2, Jens Ricke2, Claus Belka3,5,8, Chukwuka Eze3, Farkhad Manapov3,5,7, Lukas Käsmann3,5,7

1University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany; 2University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Radiology, Munich, Germany; 3University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; 4University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department Internal Medicine V, Munich, Germany; 5Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany; 6Asklepios Lung Clinic, Department of Pneumology, Munich, Germany; 7German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany; 8German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Munich, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor that significantly improves clinical outcome after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. However, metabolic changes of tumoral lesions and secondary lymphoid organs during durvalumab treatment are unknown until now. Therefore, we assessed metabolic patterns on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients after durvalumab initiation versus patients undergoing CRT alone.

Material and Methods

18F-FDG PET/CTs both before the initiation and after the completion of standard CRT were analyzed in 43 patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC. Thereof, 16 patients received additional durvalumab. Metabolic changes in tumor sites and secondary lymphoid organs were assessed and directly compared in the CRT alone and the durvalumab groups. Furthermore, scans were evaluated with regard to findings suspicious for immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE), the readers being blinded for the durvalumab administration.

Results

Before durvalumab administration, uptake characteristics were comparable in both groups, e.g. median tumoral SUVmax was 12.6 without vs. 13.4 with durvalumab (p = 0.452). With the initiation of durvalumab, however, uptake patterns in PET/CT diverged: A significantly higher reduction of tumoral uptake intensity was noted in the durvalumab group in comparison to the CRT alone group, e. g. median decrease of SUVmax –70.0% vs. –24.8%, respectively (p = 0.009). On the contrary, the spleen uptake increased after durvalumab initiation while it dropped in the group undergoing CRT alone (median +12.5% vs. –4.4%, p = 0.029). This was not the case for bone marrow uptake (+6.0% vs. –3.0, p = 0.353).

The median follow up time of the overall group was 28 months. Few events (progression/death) were noted in patients undergoing additional durvalumab treatment and the progression-free survival was significantly longer in those patients (median 19 vs. 6 months, p = 0.008).

PET/CT findings suggestive of an irAE (e.g. a sarcoid-like reaction) were present more often in patients undergoing durvalumab treatment compared to patients undergoing CRT alone (12/16 vs. 8/27 patients, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Here, we present first preliminary data on the influence of durvalumab on 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Initiation of durvalumab consolidation after CRT leads to diverging metabolic patterns at tumor sites, but also alters splenic metabolism and leads to a significantly higher incidence of findings suggestive of irAE.