Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
16:30 - 17:30
Plenary Hall
Reirradiation
Arnaud Beddok, France;
Giulio Francolini, Italy
3460
Proffered Papers
Clinical
17:10 - 17:20
Stereotactic reirradiation:toxicity profile results from a phase I dose escalation study (Destroy-1)
Donato Pezzulla, Italy
OC-0919

Abstract

Stereotactic reirradiation:toxicity profile results from a phase I dose escalation study (Destroy-1)
Authors:

Donato Pezzulla1, Gabriella Macchia1, Savino Cilla2, Milena Ferra1, Milly Buwenge3, Carmela Romano4, Silvia Cammelli3,5, Paolo Bonome1, Vincenzo Picardi1, Mariangela Boccardi1, Marica Ferro1, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta6,7, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti3,8, Francesco Deodato1,7

1Gemelli Molise Hospital – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Radiation Oncology Unit, Campobasso, Italy; 2Gemelli Molise Hospital – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Medical Physics Unit, Campobasso, Italy; 3IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Radiation Oncology, Bologna, Italy; 4Gemelli Molise Hospital – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Medical Physics Unit, Campobasso, Italy; 5Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Bologna, Italy; 6Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy; 7Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italy; 8Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University,, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Bologna, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To report the toxicity profile of a dose escalation study (Destroy-1) investigating the stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment of recurrences occurring later than 4 months after in-field radiation (RT).

Material and Methods

In the frame of Destroy-1 trial, a phase I dose-escalation multiarm stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) clinical study, two arms (d) and (e) were conceived for retreatment of recurrence following prior in-field RT and were differentiated as follows: recurrences pre-irradiated with doses >60 Gy or recurrences in locations with previous small intestinal irradiation were recruited in arm (d), whereas recurrences in sites receiving a prior RT dose less than 60 Gy were recruited in arm (e). The total dose was escalated up to 45 Gy (arm d) or 50 Gy (arm e) through 6 levels, respectively (Table 1). Each cohort was evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and consisted of 6 patients; if one of the patients experienced a DLT, the cohort was expanded to 12 patients. DLT was defined as any radiation-related > Grade 3 toxicity (RTOG criteria) occurring within 6 months from SBRT. Adverse events occurring later than 6 months after SBRT were described as late toxicities, but were not considered in DLT evaluation.

Results

117 lesions (41 lesions in the (d) arm and 76 in the (e) arm) accounting for 93 consecutive patients (M/F: 53/40; median age: 67 years; range 44-89) were treated from September 2004 to May 2022. About 92.5% of the patients had an ECOG performance status between 0 and 1, with coronary disease being the most frequent comorbidity (62.5%). Most patients had a primary lung (16.1%), pancreatic (12.9%) or prostate cancer (12.9%). The most common retreatment sites were pelvis (42.7%), thorax (28.2%) and abdomen (23.9%), with nodal recurrences accounting for the bulk of the lesions (59%). Median GTV was 8.9cc (0.35-146.9) and median PTV was 31.8cc (4.1-236.0). There was no acute toxicity above G2, and there was just one late toxicity >G2, consisting in a G4 soft tissue toxicity (abscess) in the pelvic area. More details on dose-level accrual and toxicity profile are shown in Table 1. Local control at 1-, 2- and 5-years was 93.0%, 76.0% and 67.1% respectively.

Conclusion

Retreatment of recurrence with Stereotactic radiotherapy seems to be highly feasible in terms of toxicity profile. The end of the study is awaited in order to draw definite conclusions about the safety and efficacy of SBRT retreatment.