Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
11:40 - 12:40
Plenary Hall
Highlights of Proffered Papers - Latest clinical trials
Anna Kirby, United Kingdom;
Matthias Guckenberger, Switzerland
3290
Proffered Papers
Interdisciplinary
12:30 - 12:40
Randomised phase II trial of adaptive image guided bladder radiotherapy: Disease control data
Robert Huddart, United Kingdom
OC-0833

Abstract

Randomised phase II trial of adaptive image guided bladder radiotherapy: Disease control data
Authors:

Robert Huddart1,2, Alison Birtle3, Ka Ching Cheung4, Ananya Choudhury5, Farshad Foroudi6, Hannah Gribble7, Clare Griffin7, Shaista Hafeez7,8, Emma Hall7, Ann Henry9, Ben Hindson10, Rebecca Lewis7, Duncan McLaren11, Helen McNair12,8, Ashok Nikapota13, Abdullahi Omar7, Omi Parikh14, Lara Philipps7, Isabel Syndikus15, Mohini Varughese16, Catalina Vassallo-Bonner17, Amanda Webster18

1The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, United Kingdom; 2Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Department, London, United Kingdom; 3Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Oncology, Preston, United Kingdom; 4The Institute of Cancer Research , Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, London, United Kingdom; 5The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Translational Radiobiology, Manchester, United Kingdom; 6Austin Health, Radiation Oncology, Austin, Australia; 7The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, London, United Kingdom; 8The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Department, London, United Kingdom; 9Leeds Teaching hospitals NHS Trust, Division of Cancer Studies and Pathology, Leeds, United Kingdom; 10Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Oncology Services, Christchurch, New Zealand; 11NHS Lothian, Department of Oncology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 12Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, United Kingdom; 13Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology, Brighton, United Kingdom; 14Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Oncology, Burnley, United Kingdom; 15The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Department of Radiotherapy, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 16Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Exeter, United Kingdom; 17The Institute of Cancer Research, Patient representative, London, United Kingdom; 18University College Hospital (UCLH), National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), London, United Kingdom

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Radiotherapy (RT) delivery to the bladder is challenging as it is a mobile, deformable structure. Plan of the day (POD) adaptive image-guided RT and tumour boost dose escalation can optimise treatment of bladder cancer (BC). RAIDER aims to define a feasible, safe schedule for muscle-invasive BC using modern techniques.

Material and Methods

RAIDER (ISRCTN 26779187) is an international phase II trial. Participants (pts) had unifocal T2-T4a urothelial BC and were randomised (1:1:2) to standard whole bladder RT (WBRT), standard dose adaptive tumour focused RT (SART) or dose-escalated adaptive tumour boost RT (DART). Two fractionation (f) schedules recruited independently. WBRT & SART dose was 64Gy/32f or 55Gy/20f and DART was 70Gy/32f or 60Gy/20f. For SART & DART, POD (small, medium, large) was chosen daily. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and concomitant radiosensitising therapy (CTh) were permitted. Primary endpoint is the proportion of RT related CTCAE grade≥3 (G≥3) toxicity occurring 6-18 months (m) after RT. A non-comparative design planned to rule out >20% G≥3 toxicity in DART pts, required 57 evaluable DART pts in each fractionation cohort (90% power, 5% 1-sided alpha). Adverse events (AE) are treatment emergent with RT relatedness assessed blind to treatment. Toxicity analysis is by treatment received in the evaluable population (pts with at least one toxicity assessment 6-18m) and is independent by fractionation. Disease control data (3m local control assessed by cystoscopic biopsy; overall survival) are reported by allocated treatment group for both fractionation cohorts combined.

Results

345 patients were randomised between Oct 2015 and Apr 2020: 46/41 WBRT, 46/41 SART and 90/81 DART pts in 32f/20f cohorts respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups: median age 73/72 years; 85/78% T2; 46/52% had NAC and 71%/70% CTh for 32f/20f cohorts. Median follow-up was 38.2 (IQR 26.2,50.2)/ 42.1m (IQR 35.6,50.1) in 32f/20f cohorts. 3588/6222 (57.6%) fractions delivered to SART and DART patients used adaptation (small or large plan). Late toxicity outcomes are shown in table. The RT related G3+ rate with 20f DART was 1/58 (90% CI 0.1,7.9) and 0/57 with 32f DART. 3m local control was achieved in 44/51 (86%) WBRT, 45/53 (85%) SART and 82/92(89%) DART.  2-year overall survival was WBRT 79% (95%CI 69-86%), SART 74% (95%CI 63,82%), DART 80% (95%CI 73,85%) (Fig 1).


Conclusion

G≥3 late toxicity was low across all treatment groups. DART was safe and feasible to deliver meeting preset toxicity thresholds. Local control for image-guided (chemo) RT was high across treatment groups. No difference in overall survival seen between groups.