Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Radiomics, modelling and statistical methods
7011
Poster (Digital)
Physics
ADDED VALUE OF MRI RADIOMICS TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STATUS OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
Maria Giulia Vincini, Italy
PO-2101

Abstract

ADDED VALUE OF MRI RADIOMICS TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STATUS OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
Authors:

Maria Giulia Vincini1, Giulia Marvaso2,3, Lars Johanness Isaksson4, Mattia Zaffaroni4, Matteo Pepa4, Giulia Corrao4, Paul Eugene Summers5, Marco Repetto6, Giovanni Carlo Mazzola4, Marco Rotondi4, Sara Raimondi7, Sara Gandini7, Stefania Volpe4, Zaharudin Haron8, Sara Alessi5, Paola Pricolo5, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta9, Stefano Luzzago10, Federica Cattani11, Gennaro Musi10, Ottavio De Cobelli10, Marta Cremonesi12, Roberto Orecchia13, Davide La Torre14, Giuseppe Petralia15, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa4,3

1IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 2IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Division of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 3University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy; 4IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 5IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Radiology, Milan, Italy; 6University of Milan-Bicocca, Department of Economics, Management and Statistics, Milan, Italy; 7IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Experimental Oncology, Milan, Italy; 8National Cancer Institute, Radiology Department, Putrajaya, Malaysia; 9Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 10IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy; 11IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy; 12IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Radiation Research Unit, Milan, Italy; 13IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Scientif Directorate, Milan, Italy; 14SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur,, Sophia Antipolis, France; 15IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Precision Imaging and Research Unit - Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Milan, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The most common systems used to risk-stratify PCa patients has been repeatedly shown to have suboptimal prognostic and low-end stratification performances, possibly leading to over- or under-treatment of the patients. The aim of the present study is to test the ability of high-performance mathematical models employing clinical radiological and radiomics features to improve the accuracy of non-invasive prediction of pathological features of PCa and therefore improving patients’ stratification in a large cohort of patients treated and managed at the same institution.



Material and Methods

A cohort of 949 patients who have undergone mpMRI of the prostate and prostatectomy in IEO between 2015 and 2018 was selected. The prostate gland was segmented with an internally-developed deep learning segmentation algorithm. Gradient-boosted decision tree models were separately trained using pre-treatment clinical features alone and in combination with radiological and/or radiomic features to predict pathological scores, as well as biochemical and clinical progression (Figure 1). Models were validated with 32-times repeated 5-fold cross-validation and evaluated in terms of their AUC values. The behavior of all features-model within different risk groups and PI-RADS categories was analyzed, assessing radiomic contribution through the cumulative SHAP value and the mean absolute error (MAE). A comparison regarding misclassified patients between the models and the clinical workflow was performed as well.


Results

The AUC performance of the four models can be seen in Figure 2a. The model including all variables resulted the best model in most endpoints. Radiomics appear to bring a measurable boost in model performances, although small. Considering the model including all features, SHAP subgroup analyses showed that, although the mean/median influence of radiomic features is low, their contribution to individual patients prediction can be very high; moreover, MAE values resulted lower in low-risk and low-PIRADS classes (Figure 2b). The best prediction model outperformed the naïve one in all the considered endpoints in terms of AUC, whereas the accuracies were comparable (Figure 2c).


Conclusion

Our results highlight the potential benefit of mathematical models including clinical, radiological and radiomics variables for pathological features prediction in prostate cancer. These results are of considerable interest to inform the clinical decision-making process and can provide valuable information for personalizing therapy, helping identify the correct stage of the disease and guiding the clinical course.