Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Radiomics, modelling and statistical methods
Poster (Digital)
Physics
Radiomic features and PFS post-PACIFIC in the Blue Sky Observational Study on stage 3 PDL1+ NSCLC.
PO-2100

Abstract

Radiomic features and PFS post-PACIFIC in the Blue Sky Observational Study on stage 3 PDL1+ NSCLC.
Authors:

Andrea Riccardo Filippi1, Jessica Saddi2, Elena Ballante3, Francesca Brero4, Raffaella Fiamma Cabini5, Manuel Mariani6, Ilaria Villa7, Chandra Bortolotto8, Francesco Agustoni9, Giulia Stella10, Salvatore La Mattina11, Giorgio Facheris12, Paolo Borghetti11, Paolo Pedrazzoli9, Lorenzo Preda8, Alessandro Lascialfari6

1University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Radiation Oncology, Pavia, Italy; 2University of Milano Bicocca, Radiation Oncology, Milan , Italy; 3INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and University of Pavia, Political and Social Sciences Department, Pavia, Italy; 4INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare , Pavia Unit, Pavia, Italy; 5INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and University of Pavia, Department of Mathematics, Pavia, Italy; 6INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and University of Pavia, Department of Physics, Pavia, Italy; 7University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia, Italy; 8University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Radiology, Pavia, Italy; 9University of Pavia, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Medical Oncology, Pavia , Italy; 10University of Pavia, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Respiratory Medicine , Pavia, Italy; 11Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Radiation Oncology, Brescia , Italy; 12Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Radiation Oncology , Brescia , Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

In the observational, multi-center "Blue Sky Radiomicsā€ study (NCT04364776), we aim to investigate the prognostic role of radiomic features in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in a series of stage III, unresectable, PD-L1 positive NSCLC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and maintenance durvalumab. This is a preliminary report on the first evaluable patients (n=57).

Material and Methods

Patients were all affected with stage 3 unresectable NSCLC, and received either sequential or concurrent CRT (Rt dose 60 Gy) followed by durvalumab maintenance (median of 22 doses). Median PFS for the whole cohort was 20.6 months. Median follow-up time 19.3 months. For radiomic analysis we identified the primary lung tumor on computed tomography (CT) images acquired with i.v. contrast medium, and with different scanners. CT images have been collected at 2 time points: at the diagnosis (T0), after CRT (T1). Tumor segmentation was performed by two specialists (thoracic radiologist and radio-oncologist) using the Oncentra MasterplanĀ® software. We extracted 42 radiomic features from the specific ROIs (LIFEx). To harmonize radiomic features we used the Combat tool. We compared Elastic Net (EN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models performances for classifying PFS (Leave-One-Out Cross Validation method) at T0 and T1 time points. Moreover, we assessed the change in radiomic features between T0 and T1. We used the Cox and Survival Random Forest models to evaluate the performance of radiomic features, clinical factors, and both, for stratifying for PFS (k-Fold Cross Validation method, k=5).

Results

In the first Table, we reported the accuracy and the AUC of the 3 different models tested, at different time points. The addition of radiomic features to clinical features alone (stage A vs. B-C, histology, durvalumab start <42 days vs. > 42 days, PD-L1 level <50% or > 50%, sequential vs. concurrent CRT) improved the AUC by 4% for EN, and by 2% for both RF and SVM. In the second Table, we reported the performances in predicting PFS of each patient in a time-to-event setting.


Conclusion

Our preliminary study underlines the importance of the development of a robust analysis pipeline for small-datasets. In this preliminary analysis on 57 patients out of 100 (target sample size), we exploited the application of Machine Learning methods for PFS prediction. With the use of radiomic features integrated with clinical factors, the AUC was improved by 4% for the EN, and 2% for both RF and SVM, respectively. A larger sample size should be tested to confirm this favorable trend and to hopefully reach better results.