Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Urology
Poster (Digital)
Clinical
PSMA-PET-based Definitive Radiotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer – Outcome and Feasibility
Marco M.E. Vogel, Germany
PO-1471

Abstract

PSMA-PET-based Definitive Radiotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer – Outcome and Feasibility
Authors:

Marco M.E. Vogel1, Eva K. Sage1, Kerstin A. Eitz1, Jürgen E. Gschwend2, Matthias Eiber3, Stephanie E. Combs1, Kilian Schiller1

1University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; 2University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Department of Urology, Munich, Germany; 3University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Departmetn of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) is an important treatment option for patients with prostate cancer (PC). A PSMA-PET has become indispensable in the salvage situation. However, little is known about the outcome and feasibility of PSMA-PET-based definitive RT.

Material and Methods

After screening 381 patients with definitive RT, we retrospectivley evaluated 102 patients with PSMA-PET-guided definitive RT. Each patient received a PET scan with a [68Ga] or [18F]-labeled PSMA targeting ligand ([18F]PSMA-1007, [18F]rhPSMA-, or [18F]rhPSMA-7.3). The primary endpoint was biochemical failure-free survival (bFS) according to the ASTRO Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL). Secondary endpoints were metastasis-free survival (MFS) as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates. For evaluation we used the Kaplan Meier method. The median follow-up was 35.1 months (range: 1.2-87.8 months).

Results

According to the D’Amico risk classification, the cohort consisted of 2/102 low risk patients (1.9%), 7/102 intermediate risk patients (6.9%), 67/102 high risk patients (65.7%), and 26/102 nodal positive patients (25.5%). Within these nodal positive patients, most of the lymph nodes (LNs) were located in the external iliac (69.2%, 18/26), internal iliac (46.2%, 12/26) and common iliac (34.6%, 9/26) areas. LNs were also seen in the obturatoric (11.5%, 3/26), preacetabular (11.5%, 3/26), pararectal (11.5%, 3/26), as well as presacral (3.8%, 1/26) areas. The median initial PSA before PET was 12.4 ng/mL (range: 2.1-678.0 ng/mL). 53/102 patients (52.0%) received a [68Ga]PSMA-PET, while 49/102 patients (48.0%) underwent a [18F]PSMA-PET scan. In 44/102 patients (43.1%) we treated the prostate only, in 32/102 patients (32.4%) we treated the prostate and the elective LNs, and in 26/102 patients (25.5%) we treated the prostate, the elective LNs and we prescribed a simultaneous integrated boost to PET-positive LNs. 25/102 (24.5%) patients received additive androgen deprivation therapy with a median time of 10.1 months (range: 0.2-134.9 months).

Of all, 7/102 (6.9%) patients developed a biochemical failure. 2/102 patients (2.0%) developed a local recurrence and 8/102 (7.8%) patients developed distant metastases. The mean bFS was 80.68 months (range: 75.71-85.65 months, median not reached), while the mean MFS was 79.78 months (range: 74.55-85.01 months, median not reached). Early (< 6 months) and late toxicity rates (≥ 6 months) were low. Cumulative early GI toxicity rates ≥ grade 1 were 6.9%, while cumulative late GI toxicity was 28.4%. Early and late cumulative GU side effects (excluding erectile dysfunction) ≥ grade 1 were 32.4% and 29.4%, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 side effects were documented.

Conclusion

PSMA-PET-based definitive RT showed excellent control rates with a good tolerability in terms of toxicity. Therefore, PSMA-PET should be considered for RT planning in the definitive situation, especially for patients with high risk PC.