Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Urology
6018
Poster (Digital)
Clinical
Stereotactic salvage radiotherapy for prostate red relapse, early analysis from a prospective trial
Giulio Francolini, Italy
PO-1459

Abstract

Stereotactic salvage radiotherapy for prostate red relapse, early analysis from a prospective trial
Authors:

Giulio Francolini1, Luca Burchini2, Vanessa Di Cataldo3, Beatrice Detti3, Mauro Loi4, Giulio Frosini5, Barbara Guerrieri6, Michele Ganovelli2, Andrea Allegra6, Viola Salvestrini7, Luca Visani7, Emanuela Olmetto4, Carlotta Becherini4, Gabriele Simontacchi8, Manuele Roghi6, Maria Grazia Carnevale6, Isacco Desideri2, Icro Meattini9, Lorenzo Livi10

1University of Florence, Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; 2University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", Florence, Italy; 3University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; 4University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi , Florence, Italy; 5University of Florence , Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio" , Florence, Italy; 6University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio" , Florence, Italy; 7Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), CyberKnife Center, Florence, Italy; 8University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi , Florence, Italy; 9University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", Florence, Italy; 10University of Florence, , Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio" , Florence, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Rate of biochemical recurrences in men affected by localized prostate cancer (pT2-3, N0) after radical prostatectomy (RP) ranges between 20 and 50%. Biochemical recurrence can be managed with curative purpose through salvage radiation therapy (SRT). However, positive metabolic imaging detecting local recurrence negatively impacts outcomes after SRT in this setting. Increasing radiation dose in this setting may improver relapse-free survival according to literature data, and stereotactic salvage radiotherapy (SSRT) in this setting has been shown to be a promising approach, achieving acceptable toxicity rates. STARR trial (STereotactic sAlvageRadiotherapy for macroscopic prostate bed Recurrence after prostatectomy-NCT05455736), is a prospective trial including patients affected by macroscopic prostate bed recurrence undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy on prostate bed. This trial is currently running in Florence radiotherapy department, here we present an early analysis from first cohort of patients enrolled.

Material and Methods

Patients affected by biochemical recurrence (PSA > 0.2 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy, in whom macroscopic prostate bed recurrence was detected through PSMA or Choline PET and confirmed through Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) were enrolled within this trial. All patients underwent Cyberknife stereotactic SSRT on macroscopic prostate bed relapse with a total dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Concomitant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is not allowed (adjuvant ADT after radical prostatectomy should have ended > 12 months before enrollment). Complete biochemical response (CBR) and Biochemical response (BR) were defined as a PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/ml and < 50% of baseline, respectively. Acute Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) Toxicity was assessed every 3 months after treatment according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) score v.4.03. 

Results

Twenty five patients have been enrolled since March 2021. Of these, 16 patients had at least 3 months of follow up after their treatment and were evaluable for early response and acute toxicity. Overall, CBR and BR were detected after 3 months in 4 (25%) and 9 (56.2%) of cases, respectively. One patient had biochemical progression at first evaluation and started ADT, 6 patients had stable PSA if compared to baseline and continued observation. Adverse events were recorded in 2 patients, one patient reported G2 GI and G1 GU toxicity, and G1 GU toxicity was reported in another case.

Conclusion

Promising results after SSRT for macroscopic prostate bed relapse were confirmed, with more than half of patients experienging BR. Reported toxicity was mild. Early report from this study reassure about feasibility of SSRT approach in this particular setting.