Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Urology
Poster (Digital)
Clinical
Long-term outcomes of proton beam therapy for elderly patients with prostate cancer
Takashi Iizumi, Japan
PO-1532

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of proton beam therapy for elderly patients with prostate cancer
Authors:

Takashi Iizumi1, Takuya Sawada1, Masaaki Goto1, Yiuno Li1, Taisuke Sumiya1, Keiichiro Baba2, Motohiro Murakami3, Toshiki Ishida1, Yuichi Hiroshima4, Masatoshi Nakamura1, Yuta Sekino1, Takashi Saito1, Daichi Takizawa5, Hirokazu Makishima1, Haruko Numajiri1, Masashi Mizumoto1, Kei Nakai1, Hitoshi Ishikawa3, Hideyuki Sakurai1

1University of Tsukuba, Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Ibaraki, Japan; 2Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan; 3National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan; 4Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ibaraki, Japan; 5Hitachi General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ibaraki, Japan

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Patients of advanced age are susceptible to prostate cancer. With the current global trend of aging society, the number of elderly patients with prostate cancer is expected to increase. However, the optimal management for the elderly remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated long-term clinical outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) for elderly patients with localized prostate cancer.

Material and Methods

Patients with localized prostate cancer underwent PBT in our institution between February 2010 to July 2015 were included in the present study and stratified into three groups: young, ages less than 65 years; young-old, 65 to 74 years; middle-old, 75 to 84 years. Low risk patients underwent PBT alone, while intermediate and high risk patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). High risk patients continued adjuvant ADT and the total period of ADT for high risk patients was three years. All the patients received a total dose of 70-78 in 28-39 fractions. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free (RF) rates and occurrence rates of adverse events were calculated. Late toxicities were defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Phoenix’s criteria of biochemical failure was adopted: a rise of ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir prostate-specific antigen after PBT, with or without ADT.

Results

Among 152 patients enrolled in this study, 45 patients were young, 80 were young-old, and 27 were middle-old. The median follow-up time was 110 months (range, 10-142 months). 10 (6.6%) low risk patients, 33 (21.7%) favorable intermediate patients, 14 (9.2%) unfavorable intermediate patients, 71 (46.7%) high risk patients and 24 (15.8%) very high risk patients constituted this cohort. A patient died of prostate cancer and nine patients of other causes. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was observed in 11 patients. The OS rates at 5 and 10 years for young, young-old, and middle old were 97.8% and 94.8%, 97.4% and 94.4%, and 92.4% and 73.5% (p = 0.12), while the corresponding CSS rates were 100.0% and 97.0%, 100.0% and 100.0%, 100.0% and 100.0% (p = 0.27). RF rates were at 5 and 10 years for young, young-old, and middle old were 92.8% and 83.1%, 100.0% and 91.9%, 100.0% and 100.0% (p = 0.09). The cumulative incidence rate of grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicities at 1, 5 and 10 years for young, young-old, and middle-old were 0.0%, 4.5% and 4.5%, 1.2%, 3.8% and 3.8%, and 0.0%, 3.7% and 3.7% (p = 0.98), while the corresponding genitourinary toxicities were 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0%, 1.2%, 5.2% and 5.2%, and 3.7%, 3.7% and 3.7% (p = 0.33).

Conclusion

The current study found no significant differences in disease control rate and toxicities among young, young-old, and middle-old patients with localized prostate cancer underwent PBT. Age alone should not be a barrier to PBT for localized prostate cancer.