Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Sunday
May 14
16:45 - 17:45
Stolz 1
Detectors & dose management
Evy Bossuyt, Belgium;
Gabriel Paiva Fonseca, The Netherlands
2908
Mini-Oral
Physics
16:45 - 17:45
Multi-detector dosimetry of a novel system for stereotactic radiotherapy of the breast
Paolo Scalchi, Italy
MO-0675

Abstract

Multi-detector dosimetry of a novel system for stereotactic radiotherapy of the breast
Authors:

Paolo Scalchi1, Eugenia Moretti1, Marika Guernieri1, Vito Gagliardi1, Daniela Marfisi1

1Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Medical Physics, Udine, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The GammaPod (GP, Xcision Med. Syst.) is a recently-introduced system for stereotactic radiotherapy of the breast. It consists of 25 high-activity Co-60 sources rotating during the patient treatment with two possible collimators (15 and 25 mm of nominal diameter, ). Precise dose painting is obtained  by means of table translations. GP TPS requires the determination of 25 dose rate and 15 OF in PMMA. Moreover, a water phantom is used in our center for patient-specific treatment verifications. To date GP dosimetry has not been included in dosimetry codes of practice as IAEA-AAPM TRS 483. Recently Yi and Becker proposed a practical method for determining dose in PMMA through the TRS 483 formalism  and the Exradin A1SL (Standard Imaging) ion chamber (Physica Medica 88, 138–141, 2021). The authors themselves admitted some limits in their approach and the need of further investigations. Our work had a two-fold purpose: to compare the GP A1SL dosimetry vs. detectors other than ion chambers, and provide  correction factors referred to in Eq. 25 of TRS 483, for different chambers in both PMMA and water.

Material and Methods

GP system was installed in our center in June 2021. Since no static irradiation setup can be set, the machine reference field was obtained with all the rotating sources simultaneously out and 25-collimated. The in-PMMA A1SL dose results were validated vs. both OSL and GaFchromic™ EBT3 films. A dose rate to activity coefficient, i.e. the 25 dose rate divided by the total activity amount at the same time, was determined as practical reference. Moreover, the following ion chambers were cross-calibrated against A1SL in both PMMA and water phantoms: PTW 31021 and 31016, IBA Razor, Razor Nano, and CC01. 15 OF results were compared with the Monte Carlo (MC)-calculated value as provided by Xcision: for this purpose also the PTW 60019 microDiamond was used in addition to all the above detectors.

Results

Based on A1SL measurements, the dose rate to activity coefficient resulted to be 1.94 cGy /(min TBq). The deviation from A1SL of OSL and EBT3 films resulted to be 6.2 % and 2.6% on the average, respectively. For all the investigated detectors the resulting OFs agreed with the MC value less than 1% except OSL (-1.2% on the average). Correction factors from cross-calibration are shown in Table 1.



Conclusion

A1SL dose determination agrees with both OSL and GaFchromic findings within their own uncertainties. The obtained dose rate to activity coefficient can be useful for intercomparisons among GammaPod centers. The MC OF value, as calculated by Xcision, well agrees with the performed measurements. Correction factors for 5 ion chambers other than A1SL are provided. A completion of the detector intercomparison by means of TLD dosimetry is on going. In addition, more ion chambers of the same model will allow taking into account manufacturing reproducibility.