Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
09:00 - 10:00
Stolz 1
Head & neck
Francesca De Felice, Italy;
Nadine Vatterodt, Denmark
Mini-Oral
Clinical
09:00 - 10:00
Chemoradiation in older head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients - A multicenter analysis
Alexander Rühle, Germany
MO-0719

Abstract

Chemoradiation in older head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients - A multicenter analysis
Authors:

Alexander Rühle1, Sebastian Marschner2, Marlen Haderlein3, Alexander Fabian4, Carolin Senger5, Daniel R. Dickstein6, Johannes Kraft7, Jens von der Grün8, Eric Chen9, Todd Aquino-Michaels9, Justus Domschikowski4, Amanda Bickel10, Alev Altay-Langguth8, Victor Lewitzki7, Konstantinos Ferentinos11, Sören Schnellhardt3, Matthias Guckenberger10, Volker Budach5, Claus Belka2, Richard Bakst6, Arnulf Mayer12, Anca-Ligia Grosu1, Panagiotis Balermpas10, Carmen Stromberger5, Nils H. Nicolay1

1University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany; 2University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; 3Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen, Germany; 4University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany; 5Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany; 6Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, USA; 7University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Würzburg, Germany; 8Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 9University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, USA; 10University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zurich, Switzerland; 11German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Department of Radiation Oncology, Limassol, Cyprus; 12University Medical Center Mainz, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Mainz, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

There is increasing evidence that specific subgroups of elderly patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) may benefit from concurrent chemotherapy when treated with definitive radiotherapy. While three-weekly high-dose (100 mg/m2) cisplatin is generally considered the standard regimen for definitive chemoradiation, it may result in considerable toxicities in vulnerable older patients; therefore, alternative chemotherapy regimens may be more adequate. The aim of this large multicenter analysis was to examine the oncologic efficacy of different chemotherapy doses and protocols in elderly HNSCC patients.

Material and Methods

A total of 677 older (≥65 years) patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx that received definitive chemoradiation between 2005 and 2019 at 12 tertiary cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, Cyprus and the United States were included in this retrospective analysis. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were compared between the different chemotherapy protocols following a pre-registered study protocol (NCT05337631).

Results

The median age was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 68-76 years), the median Charlson Comorbidity Index amounted to 1 point (IQR, 0-3), and 564 patients (83%) had an ECOG performance status of ≤1. One-hundred twenty-two patients (18%) exhibited an HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cisplatin (n=298, 44%; 147 [49%] of them receiving cisplatin 30-40 mg/m2 weekly), cisplatin/5-FU (n=137, 20%), carboplatin (n=68, 10%) and mitomycin C/5-FU (n=64, 9%) were the most commonly applied chemotherapy regimens. The median cisplatin dose of patients receiving single-agent cisplatin amounted to 175 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cisplatin doses of ≥200 mg were associated with significantly increased OS, PFS and LRC (all p<0.05, log-rank test) compared to cumulative doses <200 mg. Beyond 200 mg/m2, no additional benefit could be elucidated for higher cisplatin doses (p=0.067 for OS, p=0.095 for PFS, p=0.340 for LRC). There was no difference in terms of OS (p=0.135), PFS (p=0.523) or LRC (p=0.948) in patients receiving multi-agent chemotherapy compared to patients treated with cisplatin only. Carboplatin (±5-FU or docetaxel or paclitaxel) was associated with significantly diminished PFS (p<0.05) and LRC (p<0.05) in comparison to single-agent cisplatin regimens, while OS was comparable (p=0.597).

Conclusion

This analysis based on a multicenter study suggests that a minimum cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 should be pursued also in older adults with HNSCC undergoing definitive chemoradiation; however, there seems to be no or little benefit of higher doses beyond 200 mg/m2. There are indications of reduced efficacy of carboplatin compared to cisplatin regimens, suggesting that cisplatin should not be generally replaced by carboplatin in older cisplatin-eligible HNSCC patients.