Abstract

Title

Prognostic factors affecting survival in gastric cancer patients in Albania: A retrospective study

Authors

Fatjona Kraja1, Jusilda Dervishi1, Adrian Hoti2, Erald Karaulli1, Ilir Akshija3, Enes Hafizi1, Sabo Ademi1, Enkeleda Cuedari1, Henri Kolani4, Arvin Dibra4, Etmond Celiku4, Bledar Kraja5

Authors Affiliations

1University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Oncology, Tirana, Albania; 2University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Radiology, Tirana, Albania; 3University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Statistics, Tirana, Albania; 4University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Surgery, Tirana, Albania; 5University Hospital Center Mother Teresa, Gastrohepathology, Tirana, Albania

Purpose or Objective

The aim of the study was to identify the prognostic factors related to survival outcome in Albanian gastric cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Demographic, histopathological, treatment and follow up data of 180 nonmetastatic stage IB-III gastric cancer treated in our center during 2016-2019 were retrospectively analyzed, to identify prognostic factor correlated to disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Pearson's correlationslogistic regression and age-adjusted models were conductedStatistical analysis was done using SPSS version 26 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Results

Patients’mean age was 58.9± 9.8 years (range 26-80 years). Male to female rate was 3.2:1. Median follow up was 36± 13 months. Four patients (2.2%) had a family history of gastric cancer. Subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 57.8% of the patientstotal gastrectomy in 33.9and 8.3% were considered inoperableR1 resection was present in 16 patients (8.9%). Incomplete node dissection was performed in 46.1% of the patients, D1 dissection in 6.1% and D2 dissection in 39.4%. The most frequent tumor locations were: 25.6% in antro-pyloric region, 22.2% in antrum, 15% in corpus and 5% in cardia. The main histopathology types were adenocarcinoma 94.4% and signet ring cell carcinoma 5.6%. Grade 3 tumor was present in 63.9% of patients. According to Lauren classification, intestinal type was present in 20% of the patients, diffuse type in 24.4% and mixed type in 55.6%. Fifty five percent of the patients were stage III, 38.4 % stage II and 6.5% stage Ib. Patients had adjuvant treatment in 88.3%, neoadjuvant treatment 8.9%, palliative treatment 1.1% and 35% were treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). On the close-out date 66.7% were still alive and local control (LC) was 93.3%. DFS was 11.5 ± 11.9 months. No significant correlation was found according age and gender related to OS and DFS, but female patients had a higher risk for progressive disease (PD) compared with male (OR=1.3, 95% CI=0.76-2.4), p=0.3. Upon age-adjusted and multivariable adjustment for all covariates, factors influencing the risk for local recurrence (LR) were vascular invasion (p=0.04) and N stage (p=0.046). Significant correlation was found between the LR and PD (p=0.003). Prognostic factors related to OS and DFS were found: T stage (p=0.006), node stage (p=0.012), vascular invasion (p=0.04), perineural invasion (p=0.03), type of surgery and node dissection, (p<0.001 respectively) and presence of R1 resection (p=0.02). Adjuvant treatment was also an important factor affecting OS and DFS, p=0.032. According to the role of adjuvant RT a positive correlation was observed (OR=3.4, 95%CI=1.1-5.1), p=0.02. 

Conclusion

Different prognostic factors are defined for gastric cancer and our findings were in concordance with the literature. Longer follow up and further sub analysis are needed to determine a panel of prognostic factors, in order to improve gastric cancer management and promote a personalized treatment, according to their risk category.