Abstract

Title

Treatment patterns and efficacy of durvalumab maintenance after CRT in real-world NSCLC patients

Authors

Julian Taugner1, Lukas Käsmann1, Chukwuka Eze1, Benedikt Flörsch1, Julian Guggenberger1, Amanda Tufman2, Niels Reinmuth3, Thomas Duell3, Claus Belka1, Farkhad Manapov1

Authors Affiliations

1LMU Munich, radiation oncology, Munich, Germany; 2LMU Munich, pneumology, Munich, Germany; 3Asklepios Fachkliniken München Gauting, thoracic oncology, Munich, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Prospective evaluate of the clinical use and real-world efficacy of durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

All consecutive patients with PD-L1 expressing NSCLC treated in a single tertiary cancer centre after October 2018 were included. Every three months after CRT, physical examinations, PET/CT and/or contrast-enhanced CT-Thorax/Abdomen were performed. Descriptive treatment pattern analyses, including reasons of discontinuation and salvage treatment, were undertaken. All statistics were calculated from the last day of thoracic irradiation (TRT).

Results

Twenty-eight patients with PD-L1 expressing unresectable NSCLC were included. Median follow up achieved 19.8 months (range: 1.2-30.6). Durvalumab was initiated after a median of 23 (range: 13-103) days after completion of CRT. In median 14 (range: 2-24) cycles of durvalumab were applied within 5.8 (range 1-12.7) months. Seven patients (25%) are still in treatment and eight (29%) have completed treatment with 24 cycles. Maintenance treatment was discontinued in 13 (46%) patients: In 7 (25%) patients treatment was discontinued due to progression, 4 (14%) patients developed grade 3 pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5 after a median of 3.9 (range: 0.5-11.6) months and 7 (range: 2-17) cycles of durvalumab. Four (14%) patients developed grade 2 skin toxicity. One (4%) patient has discontinued treatment due to incompliance.

Six and 12- month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 83% and 57%, median PFS was not reached. No case of hyperprogression was documented. Eight (29%) patients have relapsed during maintenance treatment after a median of 4.8 (range: 2.2-11.3) months and 11 (range: 6-17) durvalumab cycles. Two patients (7%) developed a local-regional recurrence after 14 and 17 cycles of durvalumab. Extracranial distant metastases and brain metastases as first site of failure were detected in 4 (14%) and 2 (7%) patients, respectively. Three (11%) patients presented with symptomatic relapse. 

Conclusion

Durvalumab maintenance after completion of CRT in PD-L1 expressing inoperable NSCLC patients has a favourable safety profile. After a median follow-up of 19.8 months, durvalumab was discontinued in 25% of all patients due to progressive disease. All patients with progressive disease were eligible for second-line treatment.